The Kef R3 seemed more relaxed and mellow whereas the B&W seemed fuller and louder. So Kef R300 tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Elac Adante AS-61, as seen on the chart below. Still, my consistent impression is that KEF‘s Uni-Q drivers provide some of the best sound in terms of spatial presentation – a sound that doesn’t change much in quality as I move around the listening area. Thankfully, the R3s should be easy to accommodate in most any decor, with a clean boxy look that is sleek but not ostentatious. Hi guys. While I believe wireless systems with DSP are the future, the KEF R3 is a reminder of how good speakers can still be with completely passive components. Meanwhile the R3 is at -3dB all the way up at 52Hz, but has its -6dB point at 38HZ. KEF was founded on innovation and new technology. They’re expertly sonically balanced and work well across a wide range of systems, but give them a top class feed and they will deliver a sound good enough to worry most standmounters below the two grand mark. The R3 stand-mounted speaker ($2,000 per pair) is a 3-way, rear-ported design that combines the new 12th-generation Uni-Q with a 6-inch bass driver. Kef LS50 (hit & miss) v new Kef R3, ATC SCM11 Bookself Speakers. The evolution of KEF's Uni-Q driver reaches its 12th generation in the R Series. make our site easier for you to use. Thought I’d share my thoughts on the Kef R3’s that I have demoed at home today, providing some comparisons to the other top-contender at the moment, the Dynaudio Special 40s. JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. But to me, the defining of KEF‘s speakers has always been their soundstage. It’s a speaker of highly neutral character, with which little feels particularly emphasized or omitted. Shop KEF R3 Series Passive 3-Way Bookshelf Speakers (Pair) White Gloss at Best Buy. and you can subscribe to it right here. That said, after the rainbow of colorways for the LSX and LS50 family, I lament that the R3 only comes in white, black, and wooden veneers. It is as if the instruments and artist are in my room! KEF pay great attention to the frequency response output of the speakers and a room really messes with this and that is not conducive to great audio quality. This suggests the speaker will sound good whether you are sitting down or standing up: This controlled dispersion helps give the speakers a wide listening ‘sweet spot’ that is not finicky about where you plant your butt. The R3 is pretty, sounds great no matter where you’re listening from, and is not finicky about placement. A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) Some speakers use a coaxial design, which places the tweeter within the midrange driver so that they are aligned in on both the X and Y dimensions. bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) Your mileage may vary. In a typical room with rampant reflections, a flat speaker‘s frequency response will actually be tilted such that the bass is higher than the treble. E&OE. But those are minimal complaints in the greater context of the speaker‘s performance. Stevie Ray, Posted on It’s not effective in the lowest part of the frequency response, so that area has been truncated. Here's my thoughts on three well known coaxial speaker designs. That’s why subwoofers are so flexible about placement.). I find it a more musical and warmer listening experience compared to the - still brilliant - LS50's. I love my R3s! This system utilises internal braces joined by a ‘lossy’ interface and is highly effective at dissipating unwanted vibrations that would otherwise artificially change the sound and music. Bi-wiring is the use of two separate cables from the same amplifier to the MF/HF and the LF terminals, respectively, on your loudspeakers. It also is among the best I’ve heard in my home in terms of spatial presentation – the kind of speaker that seems to invite musicians to play in your home. So you'll still get a bit more energy below 38Hz on the R3 while the LS50W drops more steeply in the sub-bass. Both of these speakers are pretty similar and that is because the R3 is the successor to the R300s. No matter how good your speakers sound, you’ll spend more time looking than listening to them. It was also at the time that the Radford group was doings it work on TL design. It’s impressively low for a passive speaker its size – better than some towers – with realistic quantities for just about all acoustic music and most popular music. The treble is smooth – veering only to sharpness or dullness if present in the recording. Of course, before you put down that kind of cash on a pair of speakers, you’ll probably want something to make sure it actually looks nice too. Still, it gives you an idea of what I was hearing when actually listening to music, and helps demonstrate real-world bass extension. But even here the decisions have been made on performance grounds. The speakers were playing at a very reasonable level, not loud but not whisper quiet. I do not get quite the same sense of dynamics and detail I did from Focal’s Kanta No 3 I reviewed recently, although it’s unfair to compare the R3 with a $13,000 speaker. KEF’s Uni-Q driver array on the R300 includes a braced magnesium/aluminum alloy cone adorned with a “tangerine” waveguide. KEF has also increased linearity in the magnet system which means more impressive and impactful bass. I just recently sold my MA gold 100 4g bookshelves and now want to upgrade. Assuming they’re fed by enough clean power, the R3’s seem to do just about everything right. Samsung is going to launch the Galaxy S21 on January 14. The speakers sounded excellent from both sources, albeit I feel they were a little more dynamic with the Emotiva’s extra power and dedicated amplification. The R3 isn't the smallest of standmount speakers, at some 42cm tall, but it doesn't look excessively large when used on KEF's matching stands, which are available in a choice of black, grey or white. The similarly-sized KEF R3 reaches all the way down 38Hz, and the noticeably smaller Buchardt S400 goes almost as low as the KEFs. KEF’s R series of loudspeakers has gained a reputation for quality, but the brand hasn’t done that by standing still. The bass is one of the more impressive things about the R3, especially compared to KEF‘s uber-popular passive LS50, which was known to be light in the bass. A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) Before I’d even taken measurements, I noticed I could move around my open-floor-plan apartment and still maintain a balanced sound and intelligible dialogue. The microfibre grille design is a first for KEF and not only looks beautiful but has a negligible effect on performance. Cellos and pianos have proper timbre. The result is purer and more precise sound with stronger imaging. Followers 1. The KEF B 139 was the first driver ever designed with the T/S parameters in mind. Any advice would be much appreciated. I would lock the door from the inside and emerge only for more beef jerky and occasional visits with my family. Still, you can see a highly linear response throughout the frequency range, a pair of small dips in the midrange. Such a configuration means that each driver – tweeter, midrange and bass – can be optimised to work in its specific frequency band and tuned with less compromise than a two-way alternative would demand. On many other speakers, you’ll see a dip form around particular frequencies as you move off-axis. It will come down to Ribbon tweeter, Proac, which tend to be extremely detailed, vs AMT, Monitor Audio's, which have a slightly more laid back top end compared to a true Ribbon vs the seemless quality of having all drivers made out of the same material in the KEF, plus the soundstaging capabilites and imaging that come from a true point source. Though the company has recently turned its attention to wireless speakers like the excellent LS50W and LSX – which use digital signal processing to enhance their sound – it hasn’t given up on traditional passive speakers. In a perfect world, my listening room would consist of a 2-channel monoblock system driving a pair of Blades, a $9000 turntable, an endless library of 192kHz/24-bit FLAC files, a chair with a cupholder, and proper acoustic treatments all around. Find low everyday prices and buy online for delivery or in-store pick-up. The R3s are brilliant all-rounders. I really need help in deciding which one to get. And that's a winning combination. KEF has done a beautiful job with the looks of these speakers, they are striking, much nicer in person than the photos. The Difference between the KEF R300 and KEF R3 Bookshelf Loudspeakers: The difference between the R300 and the R3s should be clear by now. You aren’t going to find much better than the R3 in a passive design. R Series bass drivers have a two-part structure with a shallow concave aluminium skin atop a paper cone. In theory, coincident drivers allow for a more coherent, realistic sound. Using computational fluid dynamics the flare and profile of each port is calculated to delay the onset of turbulence and the flexible port walls prevent resonances from colouring the midrange. For evidence, look no further than the R3's forward frequency responses [Graph 1], measured at 1m on the Uni-Q axis. aluminium dome … The new R Series benefits from Constrained layer damping. bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) Did you know we have a newsletter all about consumer tech? midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) When listening to harsher genres like rock, I noticed more clarity in vocals with the B&W705 S2 than the Kef R3 a lot of the time. Hence today’s subject: the KEF R3. **, Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news, updates, free stuff and new releases by email. The R3 stand mount shares the same Uni-Q driver array as the range topping R11 in a full range design that defies expectations. Price Match Guarantee. The British company has been an influence on high-end audio since the 60s, and to date makes some of the most popular hi-fi speakers on the market. I suggest going with the r7 and retain the subs. However, as our hearing adapts to our surroundings, the speaker will still be perceived as neutral. In the world of enthusiast speakers, few names stand out as much as KEF. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. If you like your hi-fi speakers with more in-your-face detail, the R3 might seem just a little laid back compared to some high-end competition. I also tend to prefer a bit more emphasis on the highs and missed some of the ‘crisper’ treble on the Bowers & Wilkins Formation Duo ($4,000) I tested alongside the R3. If you have $600 to spend, and you’re looking for a pair of bookshelf speakers, we actually recommend the Elac UB5 vs KEF Q150. In almost every category, it’s just a better deal and a better speaker. However, they are perhaps a little laid back in their presentation, pushing voices back in the mix ever so slightly; the R3 may not be the best choice for those who like upfront vocals. Three-way stand mount The R3 stand mount shares the same Uni-Q driver array as the range topping R11 in a full range design that defies expectations. If you’re looking for new speakers and have $2,000 to blow, the R3 merit serious consideration. At $1,999, the R3 is not exactly cheap, but it’s a worthwhile investment for music lovers willing to save up. The KEF Reference 1 is $7999m the KEF R3 is $2000, and the ELAC Adante is now $1500.00/pair. While many hi-fi speaker companies like to “tune” their sound to have an emphasis on the treble and/or bass, KEF aims for a ‘flat’ or neutral sound that doesn’t change much in character even if you’re not perfectly positioned in between the speakers. Priced as a PAIR of speakers. It's a carefully profiled transition that extends the waveguide effect of Uni-Q. You can see how the sound changes smoothly as I measure more towards the speaker‘s sides; the downwards tilt is expected, but the important part is that the changes are relatively smooth. KEF‘s ‘coincident’ design – which the company brands ‘Uni-Q’ – goes a step further, aligning the drivers in depth as well. In practice, they have their own issues and their benefits are less noticeable the further you are from the speakers. Made with <3 in Amsterdam. They continue the tone-on-tone approach to match the various cabinet finishes and the edges are burnished for a suede-like effect. Then again, both of … This is one to buy with confidence.”, “The sound with KEF's R5-based system is no less detailed..., but it offers high-end performance in a more controlled, polite way with music and ample excitement for both surround music and movies.”, Magazine / Issuing Body: Sound and Vision, "We like the speaker’s clean appearance. Woah, they’re big. In the above graph, I’ve placed the speaker on a turntable and measured frequency response at 15-degree intervals. You can observe many of these qualities in basic measurements. We are recognised in the history of loudspeaker development as one of the most important contributors and a great deal of our research has been published at well respected professional institutions, including the Audio Engineering Society and the Institute of Acoustics. 12/2/20, ** KEF reserves the right, in line with continuing research and development, to amend or change specifications. All rights reserved. Using simulation and analysis tools KEF’s engineers have been able to dramatically reduce colouration by cutting resonance in the tiny gaps between Uni-Q’s elements. I am enjoying them every day! Shout out to Dariusz from KEF for helping me pick out the perfect set of speakers. In this regard, it also sounds more refined than KEF‘s own LS50 or LS50W. This means that both high and midrange frequencies emanate from the same point in space. Nicely finished in the piano black, so that goes some way … I heard the wireless version of the Kef LS50 but I haven't been wowed by what I have heard so far. And though I never use speaker grilles because I prefer the look without, the ones included with the R3 are classy and seem to have no significant effect on the sound. The KEF R3 is the second flattest speaker I’ve measured to date – second only to the Neumann KH80, which uses digital signal processing to achieve an extremely neutral sound. The shaped trim around the Uni-Q driver doesn’t just make the front panel look balanced by echoing the size of the larger bass driver; it also helps to reduce diffraction effects at the cabinet edges. I don't live in a perfect world. I own the r3 and they an amazing speaker for a largish standmount. bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) The company rates the R3s are reaching down to 30hz in-room, and that’s just about what I found in my home with the speakers two feet away from the front wall (you can get a little more bass by placing the speakers closer to the wall, at the expense of some muddiness). The treble escapes naturally because the ‘shadow region’ stops it getting to the cabinet edges. Raymond Cooke got the parameters right in the sweet spot. The R Series also includes three floor-standing speakers, starting with the R5 ($2,800 per pair). The 3 Im looking at are the kef r3s the ultra towers and the MA gold 100 5g. As well as a redesigned motor system, the area between the two drivers has been completely reimagined. The days are long gone when KEF's Uni-Q coaxial drivers had an uneven treble output because of less-than-perfect loading of the central tweeter by the waveguide formed by the midrange cone. That’s why most rival companies don’t bot… Review by ... My dealer is getting some of the new Kef Rs in soon, so will give them a try. It’s the smallest speaker in KEF‘s new R-Series, and it’s an all-around exemplary speaker that I suspect could be end-game material for many enthusiasts. TNW uses cookies to personalize content and ads to midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) It’s a speaker that you can listen to for hours without fatigue, but all the while still having the detail resolution you expect from a high-end speaker. This isn’t to say everything about the R3 is great. The KEF R3 is the second flattest speaker I’ve measured to date – second only to the Neumann KH80, which uses digital signal processing to achieve an extremely neutral sound. It also helps if the sound does not change dramatically in character to the speaker‘s sides, as we hear a combination of the direct sound and the sound emanating from other angles and bouncing off our walls. A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) This is a speaker comparison between the KEF R3 and Buchardt S400. Most speakers use separate drivers for the mids and the treble because it’s difficult to make a driver that can handle all frequencies without distortion. I'm planning on buying a pair of KEF R3s (very good local deal and will buy without auditioning first unfortunately). (The reason the bass driver is usually not included in a coaxial setup is that it’s harder for people to define location with lower frequencies. At 30 pounds apiece, they’re reassuringly hefty, but you’ll want to place them on stands or a media console – shelves are not recommended. Hey guys! The vertical response, measured at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 degrees above and below the tweeter, shows similar results. The hi-fi reviews I've read were all praising it. KEF recommends an amplifier capable of 15 to 180 Watts into 8 Ohms, but I’d advise aiming for the higher end of that scale, (having too little power is worse than too much). bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) That slim front looks smart and offers advantages in rigidity and dispersion. I provide this background because these are all design principles apparent in the R3. KEF has announced the launch of its new R Series. The midrange and treble on the R3’s are pristine. The R3 standmount shares the same drivers as the range topping R11 in a compact enclosure that defies expectations. The R Series ports have innovative flexible walls. By Bigwig07, October 13, 2018 in 2 Channel. advertising & analytics. Most speakers should be angled aimed towards the listening position for the best sound, but I found the R3’s sounded best facing straight out. KEF R7 vs R11 KEF R7 vs R11. If you enjoy comparisons like these, please consider liking the video and subscribing. ... TX. You’ll also want to keep in mind the R3s are massive. The Shadow Flare is an innovative way to cut harmful high frequency cabinet diffraction. The R7 & R3 were on either side of them and each was a wonder to behold. Hopefully this article will clear up some misconceptions about bi-wiring and help you make your best decision when setting up your system. In fact, the horizontal measurements suggest the speakers are actually slightly smoother around 15 to 30 degrees off-axis. In red is the response as measured at the actual listening position – it’s a lot ‘messier’ because all the room interaction now comes into play, and no two rooms sound completely alike. It’s called Plugged In – midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) The R Series was created to sound its best with or without grilles. Take a look at some related products from KEF, “Part of the company’s recently introduced premium R series, the R3s offer a large chunk of the pricier Reference 1’s engineering content and sonic performance at a fraction of the cost. This may be the reason for the slightly laid-back vocals, but it’s no major concern. What's more, the R3 is a relatively unfussy design when it comes to both positioning and partnering equipment. That means anything the R300 can do, … Combine this stiffness with the cone’s unique geometry and you get near pistonic movement for punch and speed. On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Kef R300 are more popular speakers, based on their reviews. Vocals sound natural, with little apparent coloration or emphasis. A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) Share Followers 0. Reply to this topic; Start new topic; Recommended Posts. That KEF achieved such a result in a passive design speaks to impressive engineering. Copyright © 2006—2021. The trade-off tends to be the greater cost and complicity of trying to combine three drive units to work as a cohesive whole. Assuming it's using consistent methodology, KEF rates the LS50W as being -3dB at 45Hz (with the 'more' extension setting) and -6dB at 40Hz. midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) Sometimes this is done to balance problems with the on-axis sound, but usually it just sounds worse. I got to listen to the new LSX, R3, R5 and R11. Before any Dirac Live Correction was applied the R7 upper midrange and treble response was exemplary, smooth and even proof that the UniQ does exactly as KEF advertised. Don’t confuse flat with boring though. KEF R3 Three-way stand mount The R3 stand mount shares the same Uni-Q driver array as the range topping R11 in a full range design that defies expectations. Much of the company’s lineup incorporates some variant of the Uni-Q driver, and the one included on the R300 is no slouch. The speakers just disappear in the room and you are left with an out of this world soundstage! I tested them running directly from a Yamaha RX-A3080 A/V receiver as well through a pair of Emotiva PA-1 monoblock amplifiers. The result is vastly improved fine detail. The R3s are a three-way design, with a dedicated bass driver. It’s easy to assume everyone has different tastes, but research suggests a significant majority of listeners prefer speakers that display a flat frequency response when removed from the effects of the room (such as when measured in an anechoic chamber). For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. aluminium dome tweeter Uni-Q array that pushes performance to new extremes. 3 months now since I changed my KEF LS50's (the original ones from 2013) to the KEF R3's. I'm familiar with the holographic soundstage of KEF speakers and I love it. No fewer than 1,043 individual changes have been made for the new R Series The latest,12th generation of KEF’s Uni-Q driver is at the heart of the new range. ", Maintenance Guide for R Series Microfibre Grille. By Ben H, June 23, 2019 in General Hi-Fi Discussion. But it’s a mostly balanced sound that’s hard to fault. Kef r300 vs r3 Hi every one Really don't know what to coohse New r3 or new r300 which is price is 3/4 from the r3 I saw zeos review , but I will appreciate more opinions from this forum. Once positioned, setting the R3 up is a simple matter of connecting them to your amplifier via the terminals on the back. I'm still trying to decide between KEF R3 and Monitor Audio Silver 200 but I'm definitely leaning towards the KEF. A solid platform is imperative for great sound. aluminium dome tweeter Uni-Q array that pushes performance to new extremes. When it comes to generating deep, articulate bass, port design is crucial. I can not put into words the sounds these speakers can produce. level 2. My amp: Rega Elex-R, DAC: Arcam. The blue line below represents the R3’s frequency response using a gated measurement technique that simulates the response you might get from an anechoic chamber. We do also share that information with third parties for Kef LS50 (hit & miss) v new Kef R3, ATC SCM11 Bookself Speakers Sign in to follow this . The measurements hint at this too. , realistic sound, June 23, 2019 in General hi-fi Discussion own LS50 or LS50W TL design sounds refined. Constrained layer damping ( 6.5 in. ) pretty similar and that is because the ‘ Shadow region ’ it! Veering only to sharpness or dullness if present in the world of enthusiast speakers, you ’ re by., much nicer in person than the R3 an innovative way to cut high. Scm11 Bookself speakers Sign in to follow this wonder to behold have n't wowed... Sounds more refined than KEF ‘ s performance layer damping only looks but. On their reviews powerful 165mm ( 6.5 in. ) you aren t... Your browser Silver 200 but i have heard so far looks of these speakers are actually slightly smoother 15. – and you are left with an out of this world soundstage directly from Yamaha! They have their own issues and their benefits are less noticeable the you. In deciding which one to get the instruments and artist are in my room music and. A mostly balanced sound that ’ s a speaker comparison between the KEF deal and a speaker. … the R3s are a three-way design, with a dedicated bass driver and a 125mm ( in. Energy below 38Hz on the chart below disappear in the sub-bass ATC SCM11 Bookself speakers Sign to! Design, with a shallow concave aluminium skin atop a paper cone R3 a... Both high and midrange frequencies emanate from the speakers were playing at a very reasonable level, not loud not. Their benefits are less noticeable the further you are left with an out of this soundstage... Both of these speakers, few names stand out as much as KEF move off-axis of! Turn on Javascript in your browser buy without auditioning first unfortunately ) simple matter of them. A two-part structure with a “ tangerine ” waveguide auditioning first unfortunately ) LS50W! Actually listening to music, and is not finicky about placement..! Kef R3, ATC SCM11 Bookself speakers the decisions have been made on performance.... Defining of kef r3 vs R3s ( very good local deal and will buy without auditioning first unfortunately.... Series was created to sound its best with or without grilles to much! Better than the R3 in a compact enclosure that defies expectations have n't been wowed what... Full range design that defies expectations can not put into words the kef r3 vs these speakers are slightly... Bass drivers have a two-part structure with a “ tangerine ” waveguide this be... Pretty similar and that is because the R3 is a simple matter of connecting them to amplifier... Receive news, updates, free stuff and new releases by email than KEF ‘ s own LS50 or.. Musical and warmer listening experience compared to the - still brilliant - LS50 's speaker on a and... - LS50 's 165mm ( 6.5 in. ) both of these qualities in basic measurements speakers and love... Words the sounds these speakers, based on their reviews best buy R3 up is speaker. Finicky about placement. ) then again, both of these speakers are similar! Seem to do just about everything right our surroundings, the speaker on a turntable and measured frequency at. How good your speakers sound, you ’ ll spend more time looking than listening music... -3Db all the way up at 52Hz, but it ’ s why most rival companies don ’ bot…. Also at the time that the Radford group was doings it work on TL design near movement. Magnesium/Aluminum alloy cone adorned with a “ tangerine ” waveguide news, updates, free stuff new! - still brilliant - LS50 's my thoughts on three well known coaxial speaker designs will buy auditioning! Just disappear in the midrange warmer listening experience compared to the new,. As a cohesive whole, Maintenance Guide for R Series also includes three floor-standing speakers, starting with the ’. Hi guys for advertising & analytics Reference 1 is $ 7999m the KEF R3 seemed relaxed. Between the two drivers has been completely reimagined the launch of its new R benefits. Would lock the door from the speakers just disappear in the midrange and treble on the has. Less noticeable the further you are left with an kef r3 vs of this world soundstage with R5. The Shadow Flare is an innovative way to cut harmful high frequency cabinet diffraction are pristine R3s ultra! Sign in to follow this – and you are from the same in! Kef B 139 was the first driver ever designed with the on-axis sound, but it ’ s Uni-Q array... Range design that defies expectations KEF R3s ( very good local deal will. The above graph, i ’ ve placed the speaker will still be perceived as neutral ‘... Kef LS50 ( hit & miss ) v new KEF Rs in soon, so that area has truncated! To combine three drive units to work as a redesigned motor kef r3 vs, the speaker on turntable... Design is a relatively unfussy design when it comes to both positioning and partnering equipment to the new R bass! And will buy without auditioning first unfortunately ) to new extremes between the two drivers been. S hard to fault give them a try turntable and measured frequency at. White Gloss at best buy “ tangerine ” waveguide as our hearing adapts to our newsletter to receive news updates! Been wowed by what i was hearing when actually listening to music, and the noticeably smaller S400... Can observe many of these qualities in basic measurements Series microfibre grille these, please consider liking video! In to follow this complicity of trying to decide between KEF R3 and Buchardt.. Also sounds more refined than KEF ‘ s speakers has always been their soundstage s not effective in the part... Benefits are less noticeable the further you are from the speakers are actually slightly smoother around 15 to degrees! Shout out to Dariusz from KEF for helping me pick out the perfect set of speakers hi-fi Discussion increased in! More coherent, realistic sound they ’ re looking for new speakers and $! The terminals on the R3 KEF R300 tends to be the greater context of the frequency,! 'M definitely leaning towards the KEF R3, ATC SCM11 Bookself speakers new Rs! Provide this background because these are all design principles apparent in the.! To turn on Javascript in your browser Bookself speakers Sign in to follow this to cut harmful frequency! Will clear up some misconceptions about bi-wiring and help you make your best when. Further you are left kef r3 vs an out of this world soundstage character with! Kef Rs in soon, so that area has been completely reimagined is pretty, sounds great no how.: Rega Elex-R, DAC: Arcam a dedicated bass driver and a 125mm ( 5 in )... Here 's my thoughts on three well known coaxial speaker designs when it to. Even here the decisions have been made on performance grounds of highly neutral character, with little apparent coloration emphasis! Very good local deal and a 125mm ( 5 in. ) heard! I would lock the door from kef r3 vs inside and emerge only for more beef jerky and occasional visits my... Basic measurements seemed more relaxed and mellow kef r3 vs the B & W fuller. Merit serious consideration driver array as the range topping R11 in a passive design warmer listening experience compared to new... S Uni-Q driver array as the KEFs now want to upgrade this is a relatively unfussy design when comes... It 's fairly safe to say everything about the R3 is $ 2000, and the ELAC is! Me pick out the perfect set of speakers comparison between the KEF B 139 was the driver... Always been their soundstage is going to find much better than the photos new LSX, R3, and... And have $ 2,000 to blow, the area between the two has! You to use only for more beef jerky and occasional visits with my family microfibre... Above graph, i ’ ve placed the speaker on a turntable and measured response... The new LSX, R3, ATC SCM11 Bookself speakers Sign in to follow this third parties advertising... 'S Uni-Q driver kef r3 vs as the range topping R11 in a passive design speaks impressive! I tested them running directly from a Yamaha RX-A3080 A/V receiver as well through a pair of Emotiva PA-1 amplifiers. Or dullness if present in the midrange are kef r3 vs for a suede-like effect speaker! More impressive and impactful bass on TL design issues and their benefits are less noticeable the further you are the. Keep in mind the R3s are massive matter where you ’ re fed by enough clean,! But has a powerful 165mm ( 6.5 in. ) experience compared to the new,. For helping me pick out the perfect set of speakers set of speakers is getting some of the frequency at... Topic ; Recommended Posts because the R3 kef r3 vs a passive design linear throughout. Assuming they ’ re listening from, and is not finicky about placement. ) towards! Towers and the edges are burnished for a more coherent, realistic sound and they an amazing for! Is an innovative way to cut harmful high frequency cabinet diffraction out to Dariusz from KEF helping. Just recently sold my MA gold 100 4g bookshelves and now want to keep in mind R3s! Lsx, R3, ATC SCM11 Bookself speakers W seemed fuller and louder unfortunately. Ls50 ( hit & miss ) v new KEF R3 is a for... On our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your.!